The "catchphrase" for the Holocaust is "Never forget." (Unfortunately, some are already forgetting!)
In the future, we will need a similar "catchphrase" for gender ideology because many will deny that it happened or that they were part of it, and future generations will have a hard time believing it did. As happened during the Holocaust, even now, while it is actually happening, many are in denial about the many thousands of children, teens and vulnerable young adults being harmed.
I know this is not the decimation of a people. However, it is still an atrocity with widespread harm. Besides, something shouldn't have to rise to the level of the Holocaust to be cause for concern.
Regarding Hippiesq's comment....There's been more than one "holocaust" (genocides) throughout history. The WW2 one is the generally the one people capitalize and I don't think we should use that word to refer to what is going on with the Medical-Pharma-Trans-industry complex.
What is going on is the epitome of SEXISM since it seeks to eliminate biological sexes.
Quote: "Besides, something shouldn't have to rise to the level of the Holocaust to be cause for concern."
Exactly!
This is what I keep trying to tell my liberal compatriots who just don't get it. They constantly come back with the bad-faith argument of, "We're talking about such a small number."
First of all, no, we're not. Second, even if we were, that would make it ok? So how many girls chopping off their breasts or boys invading women's sports teams or male prisoners raping female prisoners is ok and not worth talking about? Ten? Twenty? Forty? Five?
They never have an answer. They just do the metaphorical equivalent of closing their eyes, putting their hands over their ears, and shaking their heads.
I hear it's such a small number" or "so rare" all the time. It must be something that is repeated in the media so they just regurgitate it. It irritates me everytime they minimize such great harm.
The "catchphrase" for the Holocaust is "Never forget." (Unfortunately, some are already forgetting!)
In the future, we will need a similar "catchphrase" for gender ideology because many will deny that it happened or that they were part of it, and future generations will have a hard time believing it did. As happened during the Holocaust, even now, while it is actually happening, many are in denial about the many thousands of children, teens and vulnerable young adults being harmed.
I know this is not the decimation of a people. However, it is still an atrocity with widespread harm. Besides, something shouldn't have to rise to the level of the Holocaust to be cause for concern.
I agree.
Regarding Hippiesq's comment....There's been more than one "holocaust" (genocides) throughout history. The WW2 one is the generally the one people capitalize and I don't think we should use that word to refer to what is going on with the Medical-Pharma-Trans-industry complex.
What is going on is the epitome of SEXISM since it seeks to eliminate biological sexes.
Quote: "Besides, something shouldn't have to rise to the level of the Holocaust to be cause for concern."
Exactly!
This is what I keep trying to tell my liberal compatriots who just don't get it. They constantly come back with the bad-faith argument of, "We're talking about such a small number."
First of all, no, we're not. Second, even if we were, that would make it ok? So how many girls chopping off their breasts or boys invading women's sports teams or male prisoners raping female prisoners is ok and not worth talking about? Ten? Twenty? Forty? Five?
They never have an answer. They just do the metaphorical equivalent of closing their eyes, putting their hands over their ears, and shaking their heads.
I hear it's such a small number" or "so rare" all the time. It must be something that is repeated in the media so they just regurgitate it. It irritates me everytime they minimize such great harm.
How many is too many? I would suggest one is too many..
Precisely.
That’s why they’ve hoodwinked or bypassed Ethics Boards, and created crap circles of self-referential “standards of care”.
Because they know that *any* number is profoundly unethical.
A very thoughtful article.